there's earth in china, and there's China on Earth
"...with the ability to flip channels so quickly, it makes you wish that you could change the channels on other things when you're bored. Like your mother talking to you, or your teacher. Or even reading a book: 'I want a picture now. I'm sick of these words.' I think also what happens is that kids, without knowing it, or editing a very peculiar film for themselves. Because that's what editors do in films. They say, you know what? I'm bored. We need a new image. So when you sit down and do this for an hour and a half you've created a film--dental surgery to the Middle East conflict, to newborn baby, to a diaper commercial, to a swimming pool filled with dead bodies. You've edited your own film based on your inability to hold attention."
Tom Waits on televisions, 2006
"I had been on Twitter for about seven years when I decided that the environment was just too poisoned by snark and mockery and bitterness and (sometimes) sheer hatred for me to be able to tolerate it any longer. And yet I did not want to abandon the genuine, valuable connections I had forged there. So I decided to create a private Twitter account there and ask the people whom I most valued to follow me there. I knew I wanted to keep the circle small—fewer than a hundred people—and to confine the group almost completely to people I've met in person, but beyond those two commitments I didn't have any principles of selection in mind. As it turned out, some were Christians, some Jews, some atheists; some academics, some distrustful of the academy; some socialists, some paleoconservatives. Only when I started writing this section of the book did I realize that I had worked from a 'principle of selection' after all: I had chosen to interact with people who had very little in common except that I knew—from experience—that they wouldn't write me out of their personal Books of Life if I said something they strongly disagreed with. That is, I am confident that I am a member (in the organic sense) of a curious little online body, and that has been a real encouragement to me. Sometimes I ever try writing out ideas on them—typically only a few are able to answer (they have lives), but when they do answer I know it'll emerge from genuine thought, or merely emotional or visceral reaction. These people, again, are not necessarily like-minded, but they are temperamentally disposed to openness and have habits of listening—and in that sense are wonderfully like-hearted."
Alan Jacobs, How To Think (2017) pp62–63.
I think a lot of people are just flipping out over the use of the word
"normalize"
without really knowing what that would entail
To be clear, if i understand correctly, you're not saying having sex with kids should be normalized. And you're not saying that having sex with kids isn't bad.
What you're saying is that the actual attraction shouldn't be seen as something that makes the person who has it inherently evil, and it should be restrained instead of forced to go underground.
Right?
If so, everyone flipping out over this is kinda acting retarded.
Dude I'm not sure if you knew this but Normalizing Pedophilia would put children's lives at serious risk.
If we tell those "People" that "Fucking Children is a normal urge" then we're only encouraging their vile behavior.
There are ways to deal with pedophiles, and it involves either serious therapy or Immediate execution.
We can't tell them it's "Normal". It's not.
It's a serious Mental Illness that requires mental aid and therapy.
What would come next after normalizing pedophilia hm?
It would lead to children constantly being attacked, abused, and killed.
How could you even SUGGEST that we Normalize Pedophilia?!
It's like, you made a dumb post, saw the backlash, realized you're wrong, but yet you persist in your argument.
There is absolutely NO WAY in HELL anybody should EVER normalize this sick and twisted behavior.
Absolutely UNACCEPTABLE.
how to trigger 50% of enjin with mechanic
Six Weeks
Novie
alexis All of you have said to me that "pedophilia is not a sexuality". I am waiting for you to tell me
what "sexuality" means to you and
why pedophilia doesn't fit into that category. What do you consider it, then?
I feel obligated to address the fact that half of Enjin is pissed at me for my last post. I will declare the following:
1. I am not a pedophile.
2. If I were, I would expect my real friends to support my distress regarding the issue, not to call me disgusting and ostracize me, which increases the risk of someone with pedophilia to take drastic criminal actions.
3. I believe in minimizing human pain, which means taking every reasonable measure to prevent sexual assault, as well as treating people who have issues with their sexual feelings.
4. I do not find any paraphilias, sexual orientations, "kinks", or other forms of sexual attraction to be immoral or inherently punishable.
5. I do find it immoral to discriminate against or ostracize people who do have any paraphilia, sexual orientation, "kinks", or other forms of sexual attraction, and I personally take measures to prevent myself from doing so.
6. Everybody has the right to freedom of speech and expression, and nobody should be punished or silenced for taking any position on this issue.
7. By the same logic, nobody should be punished for their sexual feelings. (I am avoiding the term "sexuality" because my understanding is that some people use the term to mean "sexual orientation", which is semantically narrower than what I'm talking about.)
8. Nobody under the age of consent, according to the applicable laws of their jurisdiction of residence or nationality, should be allowed to consent to intercourse with anyone of any age. I am from a jurisdiction where the age of consent is 16, and that age seems fine to me, personally.
9. Nobody under the age for appearing in pornography, according to the applicable laws of their jurisdiction of residence or nationality, should be allowed to be photographed or recorded in their private parts. I am from a jurisdiction where the age of appearing in pornography is 18, and that age seems fine to me, personally.
10. Nobody should ever be sexually assaulted, coerced, or anything of the like.
11. If you agree with me, you shouldn't feel afraid to speak up about your opinion online or IRL.
If I didn't get to fully respond to your comment, I apologize, because there was a ton of comments for me to respond to, and I didn't get to respond to everyone (I've been traveling recently and have had little leisure time). But I believe in discourse, and you should feel free to reach out to me with whatever opinion you have.
This is a fucking TERRIBLE idea. CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVE TO STOP IT.
Child sex dolls are an option for people to act out their fantasies. It's nothing to do with "normalizing" pedophilia (although normalizing it would be a good idea). People don't commit sexual assault against children because they think their urges are socially normal. That's fucking ridiculous. All this bill could do is encourage people with pedophilia to commit sexual acts upon children, or kill themselves.
This bill is just another reaction to some dumbass's personal disgust with another man's sexuality, and using the bully pulpit against them. The sponsor, Rep. Daniel Donovan (R-Staten Island/Brooklyn), said that pedophilic fanatasies are "enough to make anybody sick", which I think is pretty telling.
FUCK THIS GUY. In the name of freedom, and in the name of crime prevention, FUCK HIM.
'CREEPER Act' would ban lifelike child sex dolls in the United States
http://www.silive.com/news/2017/12/creeper_act_bans_lifelike_c...
STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. -- The importation and distribution of lifelike child sex dolls in the United States would be prohibited under legislation that was introduced Thursday. The dolls are made of silicone, anatomically resemble young children and come with
"Fake news" is the American Dialect Society Word of the Year!
I participated in the vote and voted in favor of it. The runner up was #MeToo, followed by Pussyhat, but fake news won dramatically, by about 200 votes.
Tonight the American Dialect Society votes on the Word of the Year!
Ready to kill those Arab dick sucking whores in the name of the Lord?
For anyone interested in psychiatry, this is a very interesting take on the problem of iatrogenesis using dissociative identity disorder as an example—and how some clinicians are going to run into legal trouble by bolstering the problem!
Not plural-phobic: USPATH psychiatrist promotes transition for multiple personalities
https://4thwavenow.com/2017/12/29/not-plural-phobic-uspath-psy...
This is another in a series of posts examining statements made by top gender specialists at the inaugural USPATH conference in Los Angeles in February 2017. (See here, here, and here for more.) Note: The audio recordings linked in this post, as well as th
Joy, health, and peace to all this new year!
and have fun writing 17 instead of 18 on every paper by accident for a month!
Here's the receipt! Thanks for giving 60 likes to my post at $0.25 per like. I gave $15 to
Survival International to defend indigenous people's rights.
Merry Christmas and all! (I extended the like drive until today, so I could round up to $15 !)
Original post: