Mechanic Rex

Shared publicly - Jan 16, 18

there's earth in china, and there's China on Earth
40
...I never thought of it that way. Maybe THAT is why the CPC claims that the South China Sean and the Tibetan Plateau are Chinese territories: all the Earth really is, and they're just trying to be so nice!
0 comments
Mechanic Rex

Shared publicly - Jan 13, 18

"...with the ability to flip channels so quickly, it makes you wish that you could change the channels on other things when you're bored. Like your mother talking to you, or your teacher. Or even reading a book: 'I want a picture now. I'm sick of these words.' I think also what happens is that kids, without knowing it, or editing a very peculiar film for themselves. Because that's what editors do in films. They say, you know what? I'm bored. We need a new image. So when you sit down and do this for an hour and a half you've created a film--dental surgery to the Middle East conflict, to newborn baby, to a diaper commercial, to a swimming pool filled with dead bodies. You've edited your own film based on your inability to hold attention."

Tom Waits on televisions, 2006
35
And now it's magnified, with Youtube, Faceplant, and others.
2 comments
What the fuck is faceplant
Some people know it as Facebook. I call it Faceplant because of A) all the data that ends up being collected, B) all the cringposts on it, and C) all the time that is often wasted on it.
deep
altho im not one to flip channels like that
0 comments
Mechanic Rex

Shared publicly - Jan 11, 18

"I had been on Twitter for about seven years when I decided that the environment was just too poisoned by snark and mockery and bitterness and (sometimes) sheer hatred for me to be able to tolerate it any longer. And yet I did not want to abandon the genuine, valuable connections I had forged there. So I decided to create a private Twitter account there and ask the people whom I most valued to follow me there. I knew I wanted to keep the circle small—fewer than a hundred people—and to confine the group almost completely to people I've met in person, but beyond those two commitments I didn't have any principles of selection in mind. As it turned out, some were Christians, some Jews, some atheists; some academics, some distrustful of the academy; some socialists, some paleoconservatives. Only when I started writing this section of the book did I realize that I had worked from a 'principle of selection' after all: I had chosen to interact with people who had very little in common except that I knew—from experience—that they wouldn't write me out of their personal Books of Life if I said something they strongly disagreed with. That is, I am confident that I am a member (in the organic sense) of a curious little online body, and that has been a real encouragement to me. Sometimes I ever try writing out ideas on them—typically only a few are able to answer (they have lives), but when they do answer I know it'll emerge from genuine thought, or merely emotional or visceral reaction. These people, again, are not necessarily like-minded, but they are temperamentally disposed to openness and have habits of listening—and in that sense are wonderfully like-hearted."

Alan Jacobs, How To Think (2017) pp62–63.
35
Read Basic Economics by Tom Sowell next
7 comments
lol
You too
jewish kike with autism
“Jewish kike...” in oppose to a non-Jewish kike? Who’s the one with autism now?
it's still you.
And you’re still a shit-cunt.
"shit-cunt"
the autistic child is angry! better stay away from it.
yO
thats one of the reasons i like places like enjin :D
0 comments
sinornithosaurus

Shared publicly - Jan 11, 18

I think a lot of people are just flipping out over the use of the word
"normalize"
without really knowing what that would entail

To be clear, if i understand correctly, you're not saying having sex with kids should be normalized. And you're not saying that having sex with kids isn't bad.

What you're saying is that the actual attraction shouldn't be seen as something that makes the person who has it inherently evil, and it should be restrained instead of forced to go underground.

Right?

If so, everyone flipping out over this is kinda acting retarded.
7
yes, that's actually just about exactly what i'm trying to say. a lot of people want to punish thoughtcrime. although i don't really think the attraction should be restrained, i think acting on it should. you can't restrain it very well without castration, which would be a choice of the patient, and i think should be allowed for extremely distressing cases.
0 comments
minecraft

Shared publicly - Jan 10, 18

Dude I'm not sure if you knew this but Normalizing Pedophilia would put children's lives at serious risk.

If we tell those "People" that "Fucking Children is a normal urge" then we're only encouraging their vile behavior.

There are ways to deal with pedophiles, and it involves either serious therapy or Immediate execution.

We can't tell them it's "Normal". It's not.
It's a serious Mental Illness that requires mental aid and therapy.

What would come next after normalizing pedophilia hm?
It would lead to children constantly being attacked, abused, and killed.

How could you even SUGGEST that we Normalize Pedophilia?!
It's like, you made a dumb post, saw the backlash, realized you're wrong, but yet you persist in your argument.

There is absolutely NO WAY in HELL anybody should EVER normalize this sick and twisted behavior.

Absolutely UNACCEPTABLE.
7
it depends what you mean by "normal urge". it's not terribly uncommon, but it's not exactly standard in society. it's not voluntary, nor is it avoidable or people whose brains developed that way.

the attraction to children is not a behavior, it is a thought.

murdering people because they are attracted to something you dont want them to be attracted to is quite vile in my opinion. even murdering people who intend to commit harm unto others, as child molesters do, is vile, i think. but i can understand why you dont think so. i think therapy should be recommended to pedophiles, as you said, but not murder.

nobody is advocating that anyone be allowed to harm or sexually assault children, because i think we can agree that's vile. but you're ignoring a significant portion of society who has a psychological issue and may need help with the distress caused by the sexual feelings they have. they're people just like you and me. and you want to murder them for doing nothing wrong and having no desire to do anything wrong.

dovis has helped me understand his position a lot better than anyone else, but my position hasn't really shifted in his direction. i still believe all the things i declared in my numbered post.
9 comments
"Murdering"? Executing Pedophiles before they Murder Children is an absolute.

"nobody is advocating that anyone be allowed to harm or sexually assault children, because i think we can agree that's vile. "

By Normalizing Pedophilia, you end up advocating for it.
Because then they start wanting to "Express their sexual identity" and shit, next thing yo know they're fucking their own children.

"you want to murder them for doing nothing wrong and having no desire to do anything wrong."

WANTING TO HAVE SEX WITH CHILDREN IS
W R O N G ON ALL SCALES.
Lol
You want to kill people for being attracted to children but never having done anything?

We don't punish for thought crime. What is this 1984?
p e d o p h i l e s k i l l c h i l d r e n
Not voluntary? Yeah but who voluntarily has a mental illness? It's still a mental illness and needs to be treated as such. That's why it technically can't count as a sexuality.
Rievous if you're going to comment on this I think you should actually get your facts straight. Please read this article so that you can familiarize yourself with some of them:

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/local/la-me-pedophiles-20130115

Let me highlight a few points:

1. Not all pedophiles molest kids. Even fewer kill them. A lot of them are just people struggling with an attraction to kids. They realize that it would be wrong to hurt a kid though and therefore do not do that.

2. Not all people that molest kids are pedophiles. About 50% of people that molest underaged people are not sexually attracted to their victims.

3. Research shows that pedophilia is at least partially if not completely biological, resulting from some condition genetically or while they were in the womb. You can't hold people responsible for something that they had no control over. Now if they do molest a child, then by all means, they should face the legal consequences of those actions, but you saying that we should execute them because they're going to molest kids is just plain wrong.
2. The statistic I've seen cited is 2/3

3 it's apparently completely developmental
"1. Not all pedophiles"

Worst argument you could have made.

"2. Not all people that molest kids are pedophiles. About 50% of people that molest underaged people are not sexually attracted to their victims"

It's pedophilia, stop defending this shit 999.

"3. Research shows that pedophilia-" Is Illegal and wrong, and you need to stop being a dirty communist.
minecraft 1. i don't see why
2. no, the statistic says otherwise
3. no
dark

Shared publicly - Jan 9, 18

how to trigger 50% of enjin with mechanic
9
Eh you can always just trace art and keep denying it too. That pisses people off a lot. You can also insist they stole a piece of your art and watch the fanboys and fangirls come after you. Honestly, you can easily trigger anyone on enjin.
0 comments
Mechanic Rex

Shared publicly - Jan 9, 18

Six Weeks Novie alexis All of you have said to me that "pedophilia is not a sexuality". I am waiting for you to tell me what "sexuality" means to you and why pedophilia doesn't fit into that category. What do you consider it, then?
21
Pedophilia is a God awful sick act that only complete abominable people do.
I hate that word.
One day they will be judged......
0 comments
a metal disability
1 comments
what is a "metal disability"
Mechanic Rex

Shared publicly - Jan 8, 18

I feel obligated to address the fact that half of Enjin is pissed at me for my last post. I will declare the following:

1. I am not a pedophile.
2. If I were, I would expect my real friends to support my distress regarding the issue, not to call me disgusting and ostracize me, which increases the risk of someone with pedophilia to take drastic criminal actions.
3. I believe in minimizing human pain, which means taking every reasonable measure to prevent sexual assault, as well as treating people who have issues with their sexual feelings.
4. I do not find any paraphilias, sexual orientations, "kinks", or other forms of sexual attraction to be immoral or inherently punishable.
5. I do find it immoral to discriminate against or ostracize people who do have any paraphilia, sexual orientation, "kinks", or other forms of sexual attraction, and I personally take measures to prevent myself from doing so.
6. Everybody has the right to freedom of speech and expression, and nobody should be punished or silenced for taking any position on this issue.
7. By the same logic, nobody should be punished for their sexual feelings. (I am avoiding the term "sexuality" because my understanding is that some people use the term to mean "sexual orientation", which is semantically narrower than what I'm talking about.)
8. Nobody under the age of consent, according to the applicable laws of their jurisdiction of residence or nationality, should be allowed to consent to intercourse with anyone of any age. I am from a jurisdiction where the age of consent is 16, and that age seems fine to me, personally.
9. Nobody under the age for appearing in pornography, according to the applicable laws of their jurisdiction of residence or nationality, should be allowed to be photographed or recorded in their private parts. I am from a jurisdiction where the age of appearing in pornography is 18, and that age seems fine to me, personally.
10. Nobody should ever be sexually assaulted, coerced, or anything of the like.
11. If you agree with me, you shouldn't feel afraid to speak up about your opinion online or IRL.

If I didn't get to fully respond to your comment, I apologize, because there was a ton of comments for me to respond to, and I didn't get to respond to everyone (I've been traveling recently and have had little leisure time). But I believe in discourse, and you should feel free to reach out to me with whatever opinion you have.
26
Sexual interest in innocuous children who think that they’re going to be fire trucks when they grow up is evil. End of story.
6 comments
^^
So that's where we disagree!
If they have attraction to someone they're evil?
That isn’t what I said.
"someone" includes "innocuous children who think that they’re going to be fire trucks when they grow up", so yes, you did Dovis
Yes but the problem is that I never mentioned “someone.” 999 mentioned it, not me. I explicitly said, and was referring to, “sexual interest”, not any pronoun. 999 decided to twist my words and you went along with it.
Having read through just about all of your arguments, and doing little background research, it’s clear there are some compelling arguments for why pedophilia is not inherently an evil thing. However, though pedophilia is not necessarily evil, it’s patent that there are some problems with pedophiles that simply can’t be countered with your – seeming repetitive – argument of ‘what’s the difference between homosexuality and pedophilia.’

The underlying problem with pedophiles is the fact that they take sexual interest in prepubescent children naturally increases their chance to live out their fantasies and rape these children. I also recall reading a point on how pedophiles are more likely to act out their fantasy’s compared to other sexual interests, presumably caused by it being a mental disorder. You compare it to schizophrenia, an uncontrollable mental disorder, suggesting to me the craving pedophiles feel is impossible to suppress. For this reason I disagree with the banning on child sex dolls as they are a useful release. Yet in this argument there lies a fatal flaw that is placing the desires of the possible perpetrator of child rape over the safety of the victim – the child. The problem is that children are so traumatized by rape for life that you should place the welfare of the child and by extension his family and community above the desires of the possible rapist. In summary, the problem isn’t the metal disorder; it’s the risk that they pose by fantasizing about the children.

Sorry if this isn’t well constructed, I’m tired, and it’s just the point I want to get across really. I have a few more points that I will probably address tomorrow.

For a more informed, well-constructed view, read the first answer on this: https://www.quora.com/Why-is-pedophilia-considered-bad
And to see just how much children are traumatized by pedophilia read this: http://www.letgoletpeacecomein.org/survivor-stories/personal-stories/
4 comments
ok, so you're advocating a precautionary principle. that's the most reasonable argument i've seen for your position yet. i still disagree because it requires a generalization and an enormous restriction of the rights of a large sector of the population, which i see as a human rights violation, but you could definitely make an argument for your position on a similar basis regarding the victims.

what i take issue with is that from what i've seen from the research, and what i've heard explicitly stated from actual sexologists who have dedicated their careers to this issue, is that propensity to commit crime isn't greater. but even if it is, we still have a value judgment to make. since it at least doesn't seem to be a lot greater, i personally don't feel a precautionary principle is warranted at this kind of degree. you can call that evil, but those are my values.

as a little side note, about 2/3 of cases of child molestation are not committed by pedophiles. this number comes with a large margin of error, but it's roughly 60–75%.

believe me, though, i have zero tolerance for trauma to children. our moral code there is the same. i've seen what it's done, and i reserve that there are cases unimaginably worse than anything i've heard of in my day-to-day life. this is why the issue i'm discussing is so controversial, even when the disagreement is strong.

i'm curious as to what article you read that said that pedophiles are more likely to commit crime, because that's definitely something i'd like to be exposed to. i didn't see it in your Quora link though. the truth is that it's difficult to measure with a lot of certainty, though.

also if you want to learn more about the difference between pedophilia and homosexuality, there's a very good comprehensive article on NIH.gov here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3310132/
i read it, and the general conclusion is that they are different in many measurable ways, but they also have interesting similarities that are worth considering. if
(cotd) if you don't have the attention span or the academic enterprise to read the paper, i think there's a video presentation of it on youtube somewhere too.

thanks for your comment!
i’ll definitely attempt it later, and regarding the point about pedophiles are more likely to commit crime, I read it on enjin from someone’s argument - admittedly that’s likely fabricated. I’ll see if i can find a more reliable source. But i would like to thank for you for opening my eyes in this senstive topic - no doubt because of all the negative stigma i was naturally inclined to think pedophillia is evil, without a logical basis. i now know how pedophillia isn’t a synonym for evil, it just means they can be evil similar to every other person.
a quick google search found me this: https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/pessimism-about-pedophilia
'Several reports have concluded that most people with pedophilic tendencies eventually act on their sexual urges in some way. Typically this involves exposing themselves to children, watching naked children, masturbating in front of children, or touching children's genitals. Oral, anal, or vaginal penetration is less common.'

I am of the mind this could stem from the '50% to 70% of people with pedophilic tendencies are also diagnosed with another paraphilia, such as exhibitionism, voyeurism, or sadism.'
Mechanic Rex

Shared publicly - Jan 7, 18

This is a fucking TERRIBLE idea. CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVE TO STOP IT.

Child sex dolls are an option for people to act out their fantasies. It's nothing to do with "normalizing" pedophilia (although normalizing it would be a good idea). People don't commit sexual assault against children because they think their urges are socially normal. That's fucking ridiculous. All this bill could do is encourage people with pedophilia to commit sexual acts upon children, or kill themselves.

This bill is just another reaction to some dumbass's personal disgust with another man's sexuality, and using the bully pulpit against them. The sponsor, Rep. Daniel Donovan (R-Staten Island/Brooklyn), said that pedophilic fanatasies are "enough to make anybody sick", which I think is pretty telling.

FUCK THIS GUY. In the name of freedom, and in the name of crime prevention, FUCK HIM.
image
'CREEPER Act' would ban lifelike child sex dolls in the United States

http://www.silive.com/news/2017/12/creeper_act_bans_lifelike_c...

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. -- The importation and distribution of lifelike child sex dolls in the United States would be prohibited under legislation that was introduced Thursday. The dolls are made of silicone, anatomically resemble young children and come with

25
I don't even know how someone could need that lmao why is people that sick
I mean they wanna have sex not only with a child but with a fucking doll what is wrong with them
2 comments
That's a terrible thing to say
There are also people who try to fuck a toaster. But it's their life, as long as it affects noone, I couldn't care less.
For a person as deviant as that who needs a doll to get their urges out, its only a matter of time before it isnt enough and they need the real thing. Not to mention anything "worth" having for them would probably cost 1000's of dollars. If they have that much money to blow, they porbably dont need the doll or the doll may simply be a gateway to the desire of real children. If they cant afford it, they arent going to use it. Maybe there will be government funded "fuck a child doll" centers just as there are safe injection sites for junkies? Nothing about this should be normalized. Its good in theory for a person to have an outlet and not harming anyone else, it might work well for a small percentage in the short term but in the long run, I dont see it working for crime pevention and will only go towards normalizing pedophelia.

Things are going to far in the culture we live in. It is one thing to be accepting of people, but it is quite another to be accepting and normalizing of every single human behavior, whether it is detremental, immoral behaviour or not. The world is overpopulated and is only getting worse. Every pedophile should be red flagged and nobody should breed with them so that they cant pass on the pedophelia mutation (hell, they shouldnt be having kids in the first place) And if its not biological and something going on in society? Than thats even worse.
1 comments
i appreciate the thought you put into this, and i think you're on the right track--you just don't have the right information.

i don't see why "fuck a doll" centers are such a bad idea. i think it might be a good idea to have government- or medically-sponsored brothels for people who are at risk of sexual assault. we shouldn't accept all behaviors, of course-- i dotn wanna accept behaviors that violate the rights of another person, like sexual assault. and that's one reason why i believe in sex dolls, because when correctly prescribed, they can help prevent sexual assault.

i think it makes sense to be accepting and normalizing of any kind of sexual attraction. it's the same reason i believe in not putting pink triangles on gay people and breeding them out of the population with eugenics. but i also believe in preventing rape.

fyi, it is biological (I'll refer you to my comment on Six Weeks 's wall for more info, cuz i dont wanna type it again).
Mechanic Rex

Shared publicly - Jan 6, 18

"Fake news" is the American Dialect Society Word of the Year!

I participated in the vote and voted in favor of it. The runner up was #MeToo, followed by Pussyhat, but fake news won dramatically, by about 200 votes.
37
Should someone tell them fake news is 2 words or am I spreading fake news.
6 comments
most of the candidates are linguistically more than "one word" . but if there's any room on the planet where you can find the answer to correctness about language, it's at the linguistics conference, because 2/3 of the voters have PhDs. nobody cares about the spacebar. the criteria:
0894179d17.png
(source)
I think they just couldn't find any interesting words.
No
"whomst" was nominated
Broflake
Askhole
Shitpost

I.e. you're an idiot
Pussyhat should have won, hands down
correction: pussyhat wasn't #3, it was Take a Knee. my bad
0 comments
Mechanic Rex

Shared publicly - Jan 5, 18

Tonight the American Dialect Society votes on the Word of the Year!
33
It's going to be the eggplant emoji sigh
5 comments
I’m partial to DAB myself
oh my
Oh
They do select an emoji of the year too!
The emoji of someone with a hijab won. I can't find it on my phone kek. For the record I voted for 🤔
Yeah watch it be something really stupid .-.
5 comments
Last year it was "dumpster fire"
Hopefully it's not "fake news" this year
I'll let you know
'fake news' was nominated, and i would bet it's gonna win cuz the competitors are shit xD
It's fake news. Kek
Blood

Shared publicly - Jan 4, 18

Ready to kill those Arab dick sucking whores in the name of the Lord?
0
You're a nice troll aren't you?
1 comments
Hahaha you're a fucking retarded Arab cock sucker don't you dare defy the Lord fucking Antichrist
Mechanic Rex

Shared publicly - Jan 4, 18

For anyone interested in psychiatry, this is a very interesting take on the problem of iatrogenesis using dissociative identity disorder as an example—and how some clinicians are going to run into legal trouble by bolstering the problem!
image
Not plural-phobic: USPATH psychiatrist promotes transition for multiple personalities

https://4thwavenow.com/2017/12/29/not-plural-phobic-uspath-psy...

This is another in a series of posts examining statements made by top gender specialists at the inaugural USPATH conference in Los Angeles in February 2017. (See here, here, and here for more.) Note: The audio recordings linked in this post, as well as th

35
Mechanic Rex

Shared publicly - Jan 1, 18 - edited

Joy, health, and peace to all this new year!

and have fun writing 17 instead of 18 on every paper by accident for a month!
44
dude that was so cheesy
0 comments
Last year I kept writing 2016 by accident up until like April LOL
0 comments
December 2017
Mechanic Rex

Shared publicly - Dec 27, 17 - edited

Here's the receipt! Thanks for giving 60 likes to my post at $0.25 per like. I gave $15 to Survival International to defend indigenous people's rights.

Merry Christmas and all! (I extended the like drive until today, so I could round up to $15 !)

c1a5027df1.png

Original post:
3e214dd2ad.png
42
It's like, I donated myself, except I didn't. But it's partially cuz of me. I feel good.
8 comments
well, u can also donate urself!
i don't has monies
no income
I quit my job 3 months ago and don't have a new one yet. No income either !
i've never had an actual job
give some tug jobs in the nearest parking lot
whats a tug job
dont ask
but u told me
Look mom! There I am! The 8th like!!
1 comments
You a star
loading