These kinds of shitposts always get me
Fun Fact:
Tomorrow is Thursday
1. There is a great debate whether or not a land owner should have the right to remove a weed from their property. Those who believe so are called pro-choice. Those who deny this right are called pro-life. The issue stems mainly from the question of whether or not a plant is should have a say in this matter.
2. The idea of being pro-choice is a contradiction. You are for the landowner's choice but not for the choice of the plant? Why does the plant have no say? And as for that second matter, it has been proven that plants have brainwave like functions and can express emotions such as pain, happiness etc. Thus we can conclude that it should have a say in this matter Even if it doesn't, though, that is still no reason to kill it, because you are killing something that may one day bear fruit, or even break a world record for the biggest plant in the world.
3. Landowners who say that they should have a right to their own land are wicked, pompous fools. They are wicked because they have no regard for a plant; who happens to be on their own land. They are fools because they do not see the flaws in their words. A landowner should be willing to suffer for a few months in order to bring a life into the world who may possibly live and bear fruit many decades. Some plants have been known to live for 300 years. We do not destroy 300 years of life for the 9 months of suffering.
4. In regard to a plant who got there by the owner throwing a way eaten fruit; surely all of the above applies. When the land owner litters, they should be willing to face the consequences. But what if someone else littered? Should they have to take care and allow the plant of another? The answer is yes. We do not kill innocent plants for the sins of their fathers, and vice versa. Furthermore: the suffering of a littering victim does not warrant the death of an innocent being. As we said above, we do not give away 300 years for 9 months.
5. If a landowner cannot bear to maintain a plant, like for example,a poor land owner; what is to be done? The answer is: we still do not terminate the plant. However, they may give it up for adoption. I personally would not this. I do not understand how it is possible to give one's plant away to strangers.
6. If a landowner is too sickly and weak to maintain a plant and the doctors say that they will not live if they do, what is to be done? In all cases, regardless of their age or how the plant came to be in existence, abortion is certainly warranted. If something is after your life, you have the right to take their life first. Furthermore: the plant's status as a human is debatable, whereas the landowner's status as a human is undeniable.
7. If the land is rotten and the plant is doomed to live an awful life, what is to be done? We do not terminate it. This is because we do not kill a plant for sins which it might do in the future. If we do, there is no man on earth who is not worthy of death. What if the plant is sick and it is known that it will not live long, what then? We may terminate it. Since it will die anyways, we might as well spare the landowner the trouble of carrying and bearing it.
8. All landowners who terminate plants without the proper justification are wicked and have committed a heinous misdeed. It is fitting for them to feel horrible for what they have done and mourn they death of their plant They should be punished by the government for their crime. No sympathy should be shown to them, measure for measure, just as they did not show sympathy for their plant. Such repugnant wickedness is rarely found even in the bacteria kingdom. Thus, the landowner who kills their offspring is beneath the level of a bacteria. Tens of trillions of plants have been unjustly stolen from this world because of the misconception that such heinous activity is morally acceptable. They would have reproduced and created even more. Those who support a landowner's "choice" to kill a plant and their potential offspring just because it develops on their land is no less contemptible than the landowner herself.
you can't get 1 year closer to death within 24 hrs. you get closer to death 1 second at a time
When I win at something once after losing 500 times
ok wow there are sites dedicated to fooling people who are googling things, both with google images and google keywords. fuck that
I gotta watch this new content cop to see what #NoChin is all about
when the sun comes u
I may have been a dumb kid, I may be a dumb kid, but I wasn't an edgy kid and I'm happy for that
